• prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    The major factors in the US’s low life expectancy are guns and automobiles. Because the required medical care for the damage those things cause is already guaranteed, universal healthcare would have a relatively small impact on life expectancy, especially in the short term.

    It’s possible infant mortality would benefit. Major reasons for our (the US’s) poor performance there are people that do not seek medical care (polling suggests about 2/3 of this is either driven by or related to cost concerns), and differences in how we track infant mortality statistics (for example, the US counts all infants, even if they are born severely premature, while most countries exclude some prematurely born infants from their statistics).

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because the required medical care for the damage those things cause is already guaranteed

      Lol, no, you’re still going to have to pay for that.

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        The (lifesaving) care is guaranteed, whether you are able to pay or not. The resulting debt could cause a lot of problems, but few of them contribute immediately to life expectancy.

        Quality of life, sure. Feeling financially secure in your present position, absolutely. But not how long your ticker keeps ticking.