I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean? We should ignore glaring problems because other problems exist?
Mamdani isn’t contributing to an issue by using Twitch
He is driving money and traffic to Twitch and funding one of the most prolific and worst tech billionaires. I’m not sure how you can possibly argue with that, but please, go on.
You fail to understand that there is no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.
I’ve just described several methods, so no, that’s simply incorrect. Is it going to be as easy? No. But nothing worth doing ever is.
you are up against forces bigger than Mamdani
Mamdani is an influential person with the influence to create an ethical snowball.
You aren’t having a conversation
…what would you call this?
you’re just trying to get mad at Mamdani
You’re projecting. I’m not mad at him and I’ve said nothing to indicate that I was. You just made that up.
We’re talking about making laws because that’s the solution to your problem.
Could be, but its not necessary. And certainly not relevant to this conversation.
I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean? We should ignore glaring problems because other problems exist?
He is driving money and traffic to Twitch and funding one of the most prolific and worst tech billionaires. I’m not sure how you can possibly argue with that, but please, go on.
I’ve just described several methods, so no, that’s simply incorrect. Is it going to be as easy? No. But nothing worth doing ever is.
Mamdani is an influential person with the influence to create an ethical snowball.
…what would you call this?
You’re projecting. I’m not mad at him and I’ve said nothing to indicate that I was. You just made that up.
Could be, but its not necessary. And certainly not relevant to this conversation.