• MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There is an active policy of not preventing cold massacres. Hope that clarifies the point.

    • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      … and Singapore has an active policy of condoning and committing murder. That’s bad.

      I pray that clears things up for you.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There is no official “active policy” at the national level that I’m aware of. -As for unofficial policy, that varies from one municipality to the next, and from one state to the next. Is the Singaporean policy of executing cannabis traffickers not an official national policy carried out uniformly across the country?

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Deaths arising from acts of omission can be prosecuted. Doesn’t work with Government given the Amendment arguments.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      There is no written policy at the national level that you speak of that I’m aware of. -As for unofficial, unwritten policy then that varies from one municipality to the next as well as from one state to another. Is the Singaporean policy of executing cannabis traffickers not a national policy carried out uniformly across the country?