Summary

Ling’er, a 28-year-old transgender woman in China, won a record 60,000 yuan ($8,200 USD) in compensation after being subjected to involuntary electroshock conversion therapy at a hospital.

Her parents admitted her in 2022, opposing her gender identity, and she endured seven sessions over 97 days, causing lasting health issues.

The court ruled her personal rights were violated, marking the first legal victory for a trans person against such practices in China.

LGBTQ+ advocates hailed the decision, highlighting persistent challenges and legal grey areas surrounding conversion practices in the country.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        They just had a major step forward in trans rights in china. She could have received more, but the amount of money isn’t the part that makes it a win.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, this is far more about the government asserting that she was wronged and it’s illegal. I know trans people who’ve won rights in court and that’s often an inspiration for fighting. Nothing can undo the trauma she faced (though I hope it pays to try), but making sure others don’t suffer the same matters

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Chinese law does not recognise the concept of paying someone compensation for suffering trauma.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is a major step forward for trans rights in China which is a win. They’ve been virtually non-existent.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean sure, if you don’t consider the people of china to be China, but we’re going down semantics here.

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              yeah nah the people of china aren’t the same thing as the judicial system of china

              • parpol@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I never said the judicial system of China, I said China as in the country, people of China are a subset of China the country, therefore a Chinese people W is a China W. Can we stop this pointless conversation now?

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It’s impossible to have a conversation here without a half dozen people chiming in with "ackshually!

                  I, and every other neuro-normal person knew what you meant. I’d wager the commenter did too they just didn’t know how to contribute because the social skills thing.

                • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  you kinda implied it’s a w by the judicial system of china when you made that first comment, otherwise it doesn’t make much sense. A ‘w’ imo usually refers to good brought as a result of a party’s active actions, and if you meant the people when you said china it really wouldn’t make sense because it’s mostly a dictatorship.

                  anyway I’m good to stop having the argument now, you don’t have to reply

            • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Believe it or not, people who happen to be born in a place are not interchangeable with the authoritarian government that rules over them.

              • parpol@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                And government does not equal country. However both the goverment and the people are part of the country. When Chinese people win, the country wins. I said China, I.e. the country, not the government. If I had been talking about the government I would have said the CCP, which I am not trying to lift up in my comment. Fuck the CCP.

                • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  A country IS a government, it’s just an organization represented by an arbitrary line on a map run by people who embrace violence to take power and resources from other people.