Summary
NATO’s Military Committee head, Admiral Rob Bauer, stated that NATO troops would likely be in Ukraine countering Russian forces if Russia lacked nuclear weapons.
Speaking at the IISS Prague Defence Summit, Bauer emphasized that Russia’s nuclear arsenal deters direct NATO involvement, contrasting Ukraine’s situation with past NATO interventions in non-nuclear states like Afghanistan.
Although NATO nations provide military aid to Ukraine, direct troop deployment has been avoided, with leaders like U.S. President Biden ruling it out due to nuclear escalation risks highlighted by Russian threats and rhetoric.
So it’s a very good thing Russia has nukes then.
Imagine thinking it’s a “very good thing” that any nation has nuclear weapons. Let alone the 5,580 nuclear warheads in Russia’s stockpile.
And yes, before you whatabout, I don’t think it’s a “very good thing” that the U.S. has them either. I certainly don’t think it’s a “very good thing” that Israel and North Korea have them.
I doubt you will, but I would recommend you read this book to find out why it is absolutely not a “very good thing.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshima_(book)
No, because they are using them as a shield to commit atrocities.
I have to assume there was some sarcasm in there that I’m missing.
Rules for life (abbreviated):
Never go to a second location
Always get the interior ministry post
Never get in a helicopter
If someone with a gun enters your car, they’re gonna kill you
If someone tells you they’re not going to kill you, they’re calming you down to kill you later
Never give up your nukes