European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen suggesting replacing Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) with U.S. exports in a phone conversation with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Nov. 8.

Von der Leyen spoke with Trump three days after his victory in the Nov. 5 presidential election.

Replacing Europe’s supplies of Russian LNG was “one of the topics” the two leaders discussed, von der Leyen told reporters in Budapest.

. . .

The European Union imposed its first major restrictions on Russian gas, including LNG, in its 14th sanctions package in June. Russia still remains Europe’s second-largest importer of LNG, after the U.S.

MBFC
Archive

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s simply a strategic move to cater to Trump’s ego.

    It’s actually genius. Make Trump look good, tie US closer to Europe while unshackling from Russia.

    Appealing to Trump’s ego is the only way allies will survive. And if Trump ever leaves office, it’s still good news if Dems get back in.

    The actual logistical process of getting away from LNG is probably more monumental than is feasible in the near-term.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Appealing to Trump’s ego is the only way allies will survive.

      Very bold of you to assume that the only way “allies will survive” is by the grace of the US. Shit Americans say.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m American, but I try not to say shit like that because it’s not true.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            That in no way precludes one from being a tanky, but let’s explore:

            • As if their defense wasn’t heavily reliant upon the US umbrella and budget that dwarfs their capability
            • As if we didn’t bail them the fuck out in WWII.
            • As if this very fucking action by the EU isn’t proof of that, itself.

            God, I can’t believe you actually got me defending our own military industrial complex. But hey, I really hope you prove me wrong for their sake.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, the “me big strong American man” response. What else is new…

                • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Your standpoint is toxic. Doesn’t deserve any real consideration.

                • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Toxic masculinity doesn’t deserve a real response. They’ll just respond with another caveman answer. Seen it a hundred times before.