I had a teeny pet project using GNU assembly that was going to target two platforms.

Instead of keeping my handwritten worst-practices Makefile I decided to try GNU Autotools for the educated reasons of:

  • Text scrolling by looks pretty
  • Vague memories of ./configure make make install tarballs

I got hit with mysterious macro errors, recompile with -fPIE errors (didn’t need this before?), autotools trying to run gcc on a .o file w/ the same options as an .s file, “no rule for all:”, and other things a noob would run into. (I don’t need a bugfix, since my handspun Makefile is “working on my machine” with uname -m.) So there’s a bit of a learning curve here, inhibited by old documentation and more quietly, genAI being shittier than normal in this department

With this I ask:

Do people still use Autotools for non-legacy stuff? If not, what do people choose for a new project’s build system and why?

edit: trimmed an aside

  • callcc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Are you building a C/C++ project that should run on BSD, Gnu/Linux and other platforms? Then maybe use autotools. All distro tooling will easily be able to handle it.

    Are you just building some small project that will never make it into a distro, maybe just use something simpler. Or even just a plain makefile.