Tony Bark@pawb.social to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIndie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usageinsider-gaming.comexternal-linkmessage-square414fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down142
arrow-up1462arrow-down1external-linkIndie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usageinsider-gaming.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square414fedilink
minus-squarekazerniel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 day agoFor me it boils down to: were the artists, whose work was used to build the large commercial models, asked about this and agreed to it? No. Piracy only affects existing work, genAI affects all the future artwork they would try to make a living from. See AI hitting cultural sector hard: Fifth of freelance artists have lost income, work | NL Times
minus-squarenovibe@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoStill not theft? Things can be bad without being theft.
minus-squarekazerniel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoThat was the point I was trying to make too. The question of “is it theft” is moot, it still causes harm.
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours ago Piracy only affects existing work, genAI affects all the future artwork they would try to make a living from. This is certifiable baloney.
For me it boils down to: were the artists, whose work was used to build the large commercial models, asked about this and agreed to it? No.
Piracy only affects existing work, genAI affects all the future artwork they would try to make a living from. See AI hitting cultural sector hard: Fifth of freelance artists have lost income, work | NL Times
Still not theft? Things can be bad without being theft.
That was the point I was trying to make too. The question of “is it theft” is moot, it still causes harm.
This is certifiable baloney.