brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 19 hours agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down10cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up199arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours agowaterfox?!!! librewolf! iceweasel! i wish there was some way to know when these projects pop up and whether the had any staying power.
minus-squareDrDystopia@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoThe author has maintained Waterfox for 15 years according to the article. If only it was possible to extract some idea of staying power from 15 years of activity…
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agostaying power is only half the answer and iceweasel somehow had a bigger adoption than waterfox back in the day.
waterfox?!!! librewolf! iceweasel!
i wish there was some way to know when these projects pop up and whether the had any staying power.
The author has maintained Waterfox for 15 years according to the article.
If only it was possible to extract some idea of staying power from 15 years of activity…
staying power is only half the answer and iceweasel somehow had a bigger adoption than waterfox back in the day.