When someone repeats an argument that has been proven false /badly argued many times before, but keeps repeating it in hopes of drowning out opposition or derailing a thread. Yet not disruptive enough to get banned on forums, as it wraps itself in non-hostile, nicely written sentences.

How exactly do moderators deal with this kind of behaviour?

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think this is just a form of propaganda. If you really want a name then maybe Ad Nauseum.

    Tricky to moderate. You need to identify, and have objective evidence of, a pattern of behaviour from a user. It needs to be enough that an independent ambivalent third party would agree that the intent is propaganda. I think this is kinda impossible honestly.

    If its a small fiefdom community, just ban them.