I’m one of those hipsters who doesn’t use streaming services.

I did, a while ago, but I quit using them because the experience is kind of awful, and I’m happier now for it. I collect physical media and watch it using Jellyfin on my Linux-based home theater PC, and I’m completely satisfied with how it works.

I’m making this video because I am really troubled by algorithmic helplessness, and I feel like corporate-centralized streaming media makes that worse. Maybe this video will encourage someone else to cut the cord and rediscover an appreciation for owning your media and being choosy about what to “watch next”. Or maybe I’m just wasting time. Who knows? I suppose, you know, you’re reading this description, right?

If you read the description, say “algorithmic helplessness sucks” in the comments. That’ll make me feel better.

  • paper_moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The thing I hated about Netflix was the stress of knowing i was being watched with my viewing habits and that affected how they decided to cancel or continue shows.

    Imagine being a customer at a restaurant and the chef is in the back watching you eat, saying things like:

    “well, if he doesn’t eat the whole thing in less than 10 minutes that means he probably hated it and won’t continue to buy more burgers, so we should just remove it from the menu now and never serve that burger again.”

    Who the fuck wants to ‘relax’ and watch stuff when i know if I start watching something and stop after episode 1 because I liked it, realize my partner might also like it, and I wait 3 months to watch it together (not within their 30 day or whatever window), knowing that might contribute to Netflix canceling a show that I fucking liked in the first place!

    SO RELAXING GUYS!

    So no, I don’t stream stuff anymore. I’m sick of paying for content that constantly gets canceled, and also experiencing stress while doing so.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Side note, the restaurant analogy is exactly why I hate the seemingly American style of service where the waiter asks how the food is halfway through.

      I guess that’s a good analogy for how creepy surveillance capitalism is, it’s like a waiter judging and recording your every move and reaction throughout the entire meal.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean… that IS how restaurants work. If people don’t order the fish of the day then they buy fewer and fewer fishes until it is no longer a thing. Even the speed people eat DOES matter since restaraunts tend to be designed around each customer spending a certain amount of time dining. Too short and they will never order a dessert. Too long and they are costing you money while they nurse that coffee.

      And similar happens with even buying blu-rays. If nobody bought Master and Commander in 4k then you can be sure that experiment would be over. Instead? That thing sold like toiler paper during COVID and we’ll likely see more “prestige” releases with a huge dose of FOMO.

      As for up fronts versus long tails? Guess what is motivating all those revivals “nobody asked for”?

      Don’t get me wrong. I vastly prefer to rip blu rays to my NAS and watch via plex. But the idea that you are somehow no longer part of the marketing cycle is just… wrong.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The only way to stop corporate greed is to stop consuming. Easy to say, hard to do, but not impossible. I’ve lived most of my life striving to be as self sufficient as humanly possible, and that has carried me over into self hosting.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sorry, but revolution is a far simpler way to stop corporate greed than trying to change everyone’s buying habits.

              • irmadlad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Well, beyond organized legal avenues: national & local elections, writing your representatives, protesting, marching, I see no real recourse against a corrupted and compromised government, and my government is corrupted and compromised top to bottom, side to side. No one gets a pass. Not this administration, and none in the past. So, no matter who sits in the seat of authority, you will always feel the effects of a corrupt and compromised government.

                It is not I you have to convince. It is millions of apathetic citizens, blown around by blustering, deceptive political winds, without compass or direction. Beyond not feeding the machine more than you have to while still scratching out a life on this planet like everyone else is, it is hard to make inroads that stick. This machine turns slowly. You see, there are still a majority of people in my country that are comfortable. Comfortable people do not illicit change…uncomfortable people do, but here is no change without pain. Pain is something that the citizens in my country are unwilling to put up with to a better goal. They do not act with the long term in mind. Their future is tied to once every 4 years, never contemplating that the legislation passed today, will be with us for generations, if not longer.

        • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Go hiking, exercise, play sports with your mates. Take up a physical hobby like blacksmithing, electronics even woodworking. Spend the weekends on small projects, DIY drones, a wooden sculpture, a small knife made from recycled corrugated steel. Join a volunteer group, do charity work, help out in the soup kitchen. Nowadays it’s easier than ever to not consume content.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Open source/selfhost projects 100% keep track of how many people star a repo, what MRs are submitted, and even usage/install data. And many of them are specifically designed to fulfill a role that industry standard tools aren’t (or are too expensive for) and… guess where the data on that comes from?

          The reality is that you cannot escape consumerism in the modern world. You can pretend you are but… you aren’t. What you CAN do is focus on supporting tools and media that you want/approve of and making your own life better as a result.

          And a big chunk of that involves actually thinking through consequences.

          • hoppolito@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Open source/selfhost projects 100% keep track of how many people star a repo, what MRs are submitted, and even usage/install data.

            I feel it is important to make a distinction here, though:

            GitHub, the for-profit, non-FOSS, Microsoft-owned platform keeps track of the ‘stars of a repo’, not the open-source self-host projects themselves. Somebody hosts their repo forge on Codeberg, sr.ht, their own infrastructure or even GitLab? There’s generally very little to no algorithmic number-crunching involved. Same for MR/PRs.

            Additionally - from my knowledge - very few fully FOSS programs have extensive usage/install telemetry, and even fewer opt-out versions. Tracking which couldn’t be disabled I’ve essentially never heard of in that space, because every time someone does go in that direction the public reaction is usually very strong (see e.g. Audacity).

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              That is a distinction without difference. It doesn’t matter what mechanism is used to collect those metrics. The fact is they are there

              And, at a glance: Forgejo/Codeberg definitely has stars and watches and fork tracking as well

              Which is all fundamentally the supply and demand aspects of consumerism. It is the idea that people can identify what there is a high demand for and work to provide a supply. Which is not at all a bad thing and extends far beyond capitalism.

              But it goes back to the previous poster’s comments about how they don’t like that netflix analyzes everything they do and greenlights projects based on that. That extends FAR beyond netflix and well into even open source projects.

          • irmadlad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The reality is that you cannot escape consumerism in the modern world.

            Didn’t downvote you but, I guess what I was leaning heavily on was ‘striving to be as self sufficient as humanly possible’. Sure, even though I grow my own food, garden crops, beef, chickens, goats, et al, I still have to buy things. I didn’t mean it like I had transcended commercial consuming. But, do I really need a iPhone 17 pro max as much as AT&T says I do? Do I really need the cutting edge computer when the 14 year old one I built serves me just fine for what I do? That kind of stuff that people just seem to be compelled to purchase.

      • paper_moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m commenting on literally being watched though, so let’s say you get up to go to the bathroom after your first bite the chef marks that as ‘didn’t like his burger’ because you took a bite (watched 1 episode) and didn’t continue to binge eat the burger (binge the whole season by the end of the month), BAM because you had a life event you couldn’t control, you now hate the burger and hate the show.

        This is not a fun way to consume anything.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean… depending on how new an item is and what “tier” the restaurant is? They are 100% watching for stuff like that and probably making a note that you got up after eating only a quarter of your burger. Because if the burger were good, you would want to finish it. Is it too sloppy? Did you feel the need to wash your hands mid bite? Did it make you nauseous?

          Same with taking out your phone. Does it look like you are telling a friend what a great burger you had? Or are you feeling bloated and trying to digest a bit before you eat more?

          This level of market analysis is not at all new. Streaming services just have a much easier time automating it but… give it time until startups are selling cameras to monitor the dining area and automate analytics based on who ordered what and did what.

          • paper_moon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I guess I should put more mindfulness into how I’m consuming restaurant food then, lol either way I think we can put this hypothetical to bed.

            • Rooster326@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Or you know, don’t? And just live your life.

              Because it only matters at an aggregate level. The restaurant won’t change anything for one customer.

              • paper_moon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                That was my polite way of ending the conversation, I disagreed with the person, but I got tired of arguing about the metaphore and burgers, etc with someone who was clearly not gonna let this go.

                “I don’t like being watched while consuming anything, really.”

                “Yeah, but bro, you’re too stupid to realize why they’re doing it, let me tell you why!”

    • bluemoon@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      exactly this. i say PIR - Private Information Retrieval

      offline everything, no middlehands

      condition “the industry” as these are called to change the RND departement - live without dependency on fuckers

    • illusionist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      What’s your take on scrobble services?

      I don’t like that one monopoly company gets all the data and abuses the system with it even further.

      • paper_moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I don’t really use them, so I don’t have much of an opinion, but I agree with your assessment.