• davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why is it still considered acceptable to make I and l look the same? I get that “Sans Serif” means avoiding dangly bits, but it doesn’t have to be absolutely 100%. At the very least they could be different heights.

    • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s never been clear to me why crossing an I would be seen as a serif. It’s not a decorative finishing stroke. It’s an intentional line. What make the cross on the T not a serif, but the cross of the I is?

      And then most of the time the lower case t will have an actual serif on it.

    • vateso5074@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I feel like the capital I should always include the top and bottom strokes as integral aspects of its form. That’s how I learned it at 6 years old and it made sense to me.

      The secondary concession should be to have sans serif fonts give lowercase l a little tail, similar to what we commonly see with lowercase t.