• andz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, because that’ll surely end well. Any strong democracy would be a lot better than either the US or China.

      China still hasn’t been anywhere near transparent about COVID, for example. Do you really think they’d be any better if an outbreak of something similar would happen, especially if it originated from China in the first place.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        The WHO is losing staff today due to lack of funding. That is “a bad ending.” If someone can put up the money in short order to stop that bad ending, it’s better one. China can do that. If a stronger democracy can do it so we can have more good endings down the road, they should. I’m not optimistic.

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If someone can put up the money in short order to stop that bad ending, it’s better one.

          Money rarely comes with no strings attached.

        • andz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m with you there, in theory at least. Chinese money tends to come with strings attached, though. I’d be weary of that kind of influence without proper oversight.

          It’s not like the WHO hasn’t flip-flopped on things before due to outside pressure either, so there’s some precedent there.