“It’s safe to say that the people who volunteered to “shape” the initiative want it dead and buried. Of the 52 responses at the time of writing, all rejected the idea and asked Mozilla to stop shoving AI features into Firefox.”

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Wrong. You are both popularizing Google tech and decreasing web browser diversity when you use any chromium variety

      • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Vandium is all about not standing out from the crowd. You use it to not make a statement and hide your activity within the majority of useragents. If you want to make a statement that’s great, but you should only do it when you’re ok being fingerprinted.

          • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I didn’t mean that in a negative way. All I meant was that using a non-chromium browser to help move the needle is a privacy tradeoff. I keep both vandium and ironfox installed and use them at different times for different things.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Are you serious? Chromium is very much mostly written by Google and the direction it takes in every way that matters is entirely controlled by Google.

          • onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            This still doesn’t mean Google has some kind of ownership for it. Nobody stops you from forking it and taking it into a different direction.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              23 hours ago

              It actually does. You’re still supporting a browser monoculture unless you change it so radically that it makes no sense to call it a fork anymore

            • russjr08@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I mean technically, yes. However the sheer amount of LoC chromium has and the costs of actually hard forking (and properly maintaining it) makes it quite difficult. That’s why right now we only have the choice of Firefox based browsers and Chromium, then hopefully a good third contender being the Ladybird browser in the future.

              You could also go build a house (or even a cabin) with your own two hands, but most people typically go and buy one or pay for one to be built for them instead.