• AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Sure, if you don’t mind breeding vegetables for your own greedy enjoyment, I guess you can get on a high horse just because you don’t also abuse animals.

      • chetradley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Curious to hear your explanation for how being non-vegan can be more ethical than being vegan. I’ve heard some people make interesting cases for this, by the way, but I’ve yet to see one that can be practically applied as an alternative to our current food system.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          your explanation for how being non-vegan can be more ethical than being vegan

          boy, that’s not what i said.

          • chetradley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Help me out here then. You said being vegan and not being vegan are both ethical choices, like the trolley problem.

            In the trolley problem, an ethical case can be made for pulling the lever or not, so I thought you were saying an ethical argument could be made for both being vegan and not being vegan. I was curious to hear your argument for the latter.

            Can you elaborate on what you actually meant?

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I thought you were saying an ethical argument could be made for both being vegan and not being vegan

              right. that’s not the same as saying one is more ethical.