“The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells… The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced.”

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Edit: I removed a chatgtp generated summary because I thought it could have been useful.
    Anyway just have a good day.

      • Melobol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        In that case I’m editing it. I’m sorry for my mistake, I thought it would be useful to a point. That’s why I said it was AI.

    • bcovertigo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I appreciate that you wanted to help people even if it didn’t land how you intended. :)

    • kalkulat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was a decent summary, I was replying when you pulled it. Analog has its strengths (the first computers were analog, but electronics was much cruder 70 years ago) and it is def. a better fit for neural nets. Bound to happen.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The article is like 5 paragraphs, not even a single sheet of paper if printed (with the unneeded images and ads excluded of course). Why does it need a summary‽

      • Melobol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The summary was for the paper the article was based on. And it was also put it in an easier to understand language.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s potentially useful then at least!

          The big challenge with AI generated summaries is that LLMs are so prone to innaccuracy that a summary that’s never checked for accuracy by a human who has read the source material that’s being summarized, it just exists in a weird limbo state of maybe-false maybe-perfectly-fine and the onus is still on the reader to read the source material to make their own decision just as it is without posting an AI summary

          LLMs are brilliant first draft machines. Unless there’s a major breakthrough that improves accuracy they will need to stay that way

    • kalkulat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nice thorough commentary. The LiveScience article did a better job of describing it for people with no background in this stuff.

      The original computers were analog. They were fast, but electronics was -so crude- at the time, it had to evolve a lot … and has in the last half-century.