Google announced the end of support for early Nest Thermostats in a support document earlier this year that largely flew under the radar. As of October 25, first and second generation units released in 2011 and 2012, respectively, will be unpaired and removed from the Google Nest or Google Home app.

Users will no longer be able to control their thermostats remotely via their smartphone, receive notifications, or change settings from a mobile device. End-of-support also disables third-party assistants and other cloud-based features including multi-device Eco mode and Nest Protect connectivity.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t “end of support.”

    This is “loss of functionality.”

    Totally inexcusable.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Samsung did something similar with one of their tablets when they remotely removed an app that provided an IR remote function - a primary reason for my purchase. Samsung’s support not so politely told me, “Too fucking bad.” when I objected.

      There was something I could do about it though. Even though a replacement 3rd party app was less than $5 I haven’t purchased another Samsung consumer product or service in almost a decade.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They were rude to you about it too? Jesus. I’m pleased to say I’ve never bought any Samsung product.

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah. And even “loss of functionality” makes it sound passive; as if it just happened by accident. They Intentionally broke a working product.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Heh I guess this is my work self showing through. I’m a software developer and “loss of function” is a very severe term to me :D it’s only surpassed by loss of data, accessibility/legal issue, and security/privacy breach. On the less severe end we have loss of telemetry, degraded function (meaning there’s still a workaround) degraded performance, and finally cosmetic defect.

    • mack@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      As most of our tech.

      Being someone that yield to my tech stuff as long as possible I really love to live in a world where a company is forced to opensource everything related to a specific product if they opt to stop maintaining it.