• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Communism is an economic and political ideology of “workers owning the rights and means to productions”

    That’s not all that communism is though. Capitalism has publicly owned services too.

    My stance is plainly that communism or capitalism is a pointless discussion to even have on the topics of inequality, civil rights, or wealth concentration

    Those are all features of communism (lack of civil rights though).

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You can add things to the definitions of words all you like but it just puts you on the same level as those tankies screaming bloody murder about Capitalism.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You can add things to the definitions of words all you like

        I’m not the one doing that. You’re the one trying to redefine communism. Capitalism doesn’t say that there are no public services. A public service itself is not “communism”.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          By definitions of words capitalism and communism are not conflicting ideologies unless applied to the extreme.

          The dictionaries tell us this:

          Capitalism means private ownership of production of goods and services.

          Communism means worker owned production of goods and services.

          Obviously you could argue that all Capitalism is Laissez Faire and that all communism is some abominable mix of Marxism and somehow dictatorship, but then we have no terms to describe the 99% of industries that fall anywhere in the middle as anything except “market system.”