Bacon and ham sold in the UK should carry cigarette-style labels warning that chemicals in them cause bowel cancer, scientists say.

Their demand comes as they criticise successive British governments for doing “virtually nothing” to reduce the risk from nitrites in the decade since they were found to definitely cause cancer.

Saturday marks a decade since the World Health Organization in October 2015 declared processed meat declared processed meat to be carcinogenic to humans, putting it in the same category as tobacco and asbestos.

  • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I never said they weren’t in the same category. To act like implying the risks of nitrates are identical to asbestos is insane and just makes people ignore these warnings.

    There is a need to differentiate the level of risk because if you don’t people are going to think the 10,000kg bomb is the same danger as a Glock when in reality they abso-fucking-lutely not.

    It’s disingenuous, you’re right that context matters because displaying the two as if they’re the same strips the risk assessment of its context.

    • blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I never said they weren’t in the same category

      No, the fact that they are in the same category is the entire reason for your comment. Making such a claim is disingenuous… Which, if I recall, is your accusation.

      To act like implying the risks of nitrates are identical to asbestos is insane

      I agree. Most people here do. That’s why nobody has made such a claim.

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        How can you not see how putting in the same category implies the same level of harm.

        I hate these fuckin reddit brained Lemmy users who intentionally misread comments just to argue some adjacent point.

        Whatever if you all want pointless warning labels go for it, just know you’re not doing anything useful.

        • blave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          How can you not see how putting in the same category implies the same level of harm.

          Because I can read

            • blave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              I’m not the one who has misused several words, clearly not understanding their definition.

              I’m also not the one making an absurdly obvious strawman argument.

              How’s that for context? lol