• syreus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s still the 4th highest in nominal GDP as listed in the Wikipedia article you linked. Using per capita in a retirement state? The jokes keep coming. I guess all the retirees are just not retiring hard enough to pull their weight.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Using nominal GDP just shows how bad-faith your argument is. There’s no such thing as a “retirement state”- every state has retired people in it.

      You can make whatever excuse you want- that won’t change the fact that Florida is full of people who are not producing much GDP.

      • syreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You just want to move a goalpost that doesn’t even exist. My comment was a response to a low effort joke. If you are looking for a debate based on that then look elsewhere.

        On the topic of Florida being a retirement state:

        Florida is historically in the top three states for its elderly population. We don’t have a state income tax so people flock here to live in their savings and social security. Something around 20% of the population is over 65 and Florida is the third most populous state. I don’t need to excuse that we have a demographic problem. It is a retirement state. All I’m saying is that is a factor skewing the per capita numbers.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          “It was just a joke bro, why are you taking everything so seriously? I was only spreading misleading information about a state’s economy in a conversation about economic policies, no big deal right?”