• _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    19 hours ago

    japan:

    • people make rule34 porn of underage children: “i sleep”
    • people make unsanctioned videos of characters from mega-corps like nintendo doing stupid stuff: “i weep”

    always interesting to see where their priorities lie.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The fact that you’re trying to drag completely irrelevant shit into it about paedophilia, shows how staggeringly weak the pro-OpenAI argument is.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Drawings, as long as they’re easy to differentiate from reality, should be fine. Otherwise we will continue to slide down on the slippery slope of censorship of adult content, and one day short women and lack of a pubic hair will also be considered CSAM (I knew people who did so).

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      how is that relevant to AI; Minors AND nintendo doing some IP nazi stuff is not the same as AI stealing content.

    • mienshao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Insane that that’s your takeaway from this post. This had nothing to do with underage children, so why is your mind already there? So fucking weird.

    • Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      AI is like stealing a brick from everyone in your town to build your own house. As a medical writer it has absolutely destroyed my business.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        i heard it pretty much ruined some career of corporate writers, on certain subs, although i dont know the extent of it. on one post, the user said the company was pretty much okay with the fact that thier low-quality AI generated writings will result in less clientele and less revenue, but no overhead of hiring an outside writer

        • Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah. So medical writers have it really rough. I was making $100k+ last year. I just exhausted unemployment. The problem is that you can feed AI a list of approved claims and basically feed it a ton of examples and it gets 85% of the way there. Of course it’s ripping off our work to do that, but cash is king. I haven’t checked in a bit, but website traffic was down 90%. So, they essentially lost millions to save $100k.

            • Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              More like a claims database. We relied a lot on PubMed, which hosts a wealth of clinical data, original research, case studies, systematic reviews, etc. I love PubMed. It’s the Brooklyn Bridge of peer-reviewed stuff.