Good insights, and not just software developers, really. We don’t like ads, sensationalism, or anything reeking of bullshit. If we have to talk to someone to find out the price, the product may as well not exist.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Nearly everyone thinks that they are immune, but we’re not, we just recognize some that probably wasn’t targeted at us. As far as I am concerned, the only way to not be influenced by propaganda would be to completely avoid it and be some sort of hermit.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Exactly. Blocking out ads wherever possible is the only way to not be influenced by advertising. At least it helps to know that one isn’t immune to it. That helps to counteract the effects somewhat, but don’t count on it if you aren’t actively keeping your defenses up.

      • sthetic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I bet there are hermit influencers who post videos where they hold the latest chamberpot up to the camera and extol its virtues. Then they post a shelfie that shows their latest book haul about transcendental meditation and bushcrafting.

        • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do they just record the video to a usb drive, seal it in a bottle, and throw it in the ocean or something? Wouldn’t posting it online revoke their hermit status?

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I guess if you only posted and never read the comments/otherwise consumed you’d still be safe. Just screaming into the void

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, the thing about propaganda is that it works, and if it doesn’t work, then the propagandists will come up with something else that does work. The thing is that they’re constantly thinking about how to exploit you, while you’re thinking about other stuff.

      So for example, I hate feeling like I receive a hard sell. So, if I am at a store and somebody tries to sell me something, I will not buy it, and in fact, I’ll probably assume the product is so shoddy that it can’t be sold without pressure. Same goes for popup ads online.

      But if a marketer knows this about me, then they can definitely manipulate me. They just have to do it in a way that I don’t realize is marketing. And there are all sorts of campaigns like that.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        No, they aren’t. Any one who thinks they are is more susceptible.

        Humans are social creatures, propaganda is a social contagion.

        The only people who could be would be those with no ties to anyone. Kind of a nonstarter for the whole “cooperative survival strategy” that humans got going on.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I see what you’re saying, but I’m done talking about this. Your logic is circular at its base, so there’s nothing to talk about.

            • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Yeah, I was just trying to prove a point that anything that’s a blanket statement saying everyone or no-one does something is invalid, unless it’s a physical constraint. (Even those break inside Neutron stars and black holes.)

              I agree with you that almost everyone is susceptible to propaganda, but to say that no one is immune is simply wrong. Anyway, sorry for being annoying and pedantic, but it was kind of on purpose.

              • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Yeah, but maybe we don’t make that point on the statement that reminds people to be mindful of their beliefs and where they picked them up from. Feels like a thing that we should maybe encourage in people more, if anything.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          But the article’s not talking about social humans. It’s talking about developers, probably the most antisocial humans to exist.

    • melfie@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      True, and having the hubris to think otherwise makes you even less immune.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, that is the generalization that the article pushed. It’s not true, because developers are not homogeneous. The point of my statement is “if you are a developer, ignore this because it is not true. You don’t have some sort of power that makes you immune to marketing. You’re just as susceptible as the rest of us, just in a different way. Ya know, like everyone else is”