Join us on Sept 12 at 6am PT for a Nintendo Direct! Tune in for roughly 60 minutes of information on upcoming Nintendo Switch 2 and Nintendo Switch games.
Join us on Sept 12 at 6am PT for a Nintendo Direct! Tune in for roughly 60 minutes of information on upcoming Nintendo Switch 2 and Nintendo Switch games.
Microsoft and Sony aren’t currently trying to sue other developers into the ground. Nintendo is.
Fuck Nintendo and quit licking their boots
tHiS cOmPaNy Is UsInG tHe LeGaL sYsTeM tO pRoTeCt ThEiR iPs WhAt AsShOlEs ThEiR fAnS mUsT bE bOoTlIcKeRs
Ok buddy
Nintendo is suing Palworld over patents they filed AFTER Palworld released, and said patents are so broad that many other games also technically violate said bullshit patents. Nintendo is the one in the wrong.
Source for the latest bullshit patent that they were awarded: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/09/10/uh-oh-nintendo-just-landed-a-summoning-and-battling-patent/
Eat my entire ass, bootlicker.
[citation needed], because given their size this feels more than just unlikely.
Are you literally asking me to provide proof that somwthing isn’t happening?
You can’t prove a negative, dumbass. The onus of proof is on you
*blinks*
You are calling me the “dumbass”, here? 😅 Both logic and philosophy say this perspective is wrong, and also, funnily enough, if this were true (as in, it’s not possible to proof a negative assertion in a burden-of-proof scenario) then that very claim could not be proven either? Because “You cannot prove a negative” is, in itself, a negative assertion.
Luckily for us this is of course wrong, and you can prove a negative. Especially in matters of fact, since you could find a list of current filings of Microsoft and hence show that no, of all their ongoing lawsuits, there are none that are targetting developers (which is not the case, it was easy enough to find two cases without digging any deeper).
And I mean, this doesn’t do shit to exhonorate Nintendo here, but let’s not pretend Microsoft and Sony aren’t constantly running hundreds of legal cases and multiple will be targetting developers of all sizes. They’re just avoiding big press about most of them.
If you’ve ever taken a philosophy course you’d know you’re completely full of shit.
Your whole comment belongs on r/okbuddyretard. Not that I should have expected any better from a Nintendo bootlicker
You can just admit you were wrong, you know? Both about current legal cases and about how how proofs of negative claims are viewed in mathmatics particularly logic, and in philosophy. That’s okay. Sometimes we are wrong, and we learn from accepting that.
I don’t disagree Nintendo is a shithole company, after all. Just take it as a learning experience: More than one company can be shite at the same time.