• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I don’t buy the malware arguement. Most major social apps function like malware (tracking location and anything they can). In the 90s, any app that did that (say to your laptop) would be treated as spyware.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Also the true malware is currently signed and it still reaches millions of people, most of the time downloaded straight from store.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      No doubt many “legitimate” apps, including some of Google’s own are spyware. This claims to be about the sort of malware that steals your bank account login.

      I’d even speculate that most of the people involved are working in good faith; they think they’re the good guys and they can be trusted with that kind of power. Nobody should have that kind of power though because it always leads to corruption.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would argue that was the definition even in the early 2000s. then it became a business model for famous companies.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        True, even in the early 2000s, an application tracking your laptop locations would be treated as extremely dangerous spyware and the relevant could would be treated as a borderline criminal actor.