Hello,

I have been researching about blockchains and stuff and it all seems like a big scam. It’s not sustainable and can be replaced by a simple database.

is there any legitimate use cases of blockchains or it is all just a big scam?

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Git uses signed blocks for centralization… you can see that the official linux kernel is signed by linus torvalds… but all of this is irrelevant because blockchains are a datastructure that is indepenant from the concept of centralization. It is just a chain of blocks… proof-of-work and signing are about centralization but they are different concepts.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I’m not sure I follow how (de)centralisation can be a different concept from blockchains when the definition of a blockchain is something like a ledger-like data structure which is immutable, decentralised and distributed.

      Meanwhile with git, one user can unilaterally change the history by hard resetting and force pushing; then the other “nodes” just have to accept the changes.

      • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Idk where you got that definition… a block chain is just a chain of blocks…

        If someone unilaterally forces a history change, that will be apparent to everyone and they can choose to reject those changes…

        • steeznson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Ok, I think we’ve established that we disagree what a blockchain is. Doesn’t really matter I suppose, nice talking with you!