• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So, not 4x, but 2x.

    BTW, did you know HughesNet is cheaper, and works just as well. Or, it will work just as well once Starlink reaches the saturation HughesNet faces.

    • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Physics says otherwise.

      Geostationary orbit, which is where hughesnet satellites are, is approximately 22 THOUSAND miles away.

      That’s a round trip of 44 thousand miles.

      That’s a ping time of 236ms just for the satellite connection, before any other connections are added in.

      That’s worse than my dialup latency was in the 90s

      Meanwhile, my Starlink ping averages less than 40ms, because these satellites are MUCH MUCH closer.

        • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          It’s cute that you’re worried about me. But it’s still better than whatever else is currently available at my house. And it will always be better than anything using geostationary orbit.