• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Subjectively speaking, I don’t see it so that good a job of being current or priortizing current over older.

    While RAG is the way to give LLM a shot at staying current, I just didn’t see it doing that good a job with library documentation. Maybe it can do all right with tweaks like additional properties or arguments, but more structural changes to libraries I just don’t see being handled.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Exactly. It’s an very niche library (tmap for R) and just was completely overhauled. Gemini, chatGPT and Copilot all seem pretty confused and mix up the old and new syntax

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thats a lot on implementation of the LLM engine . For python or js you can feed the API schema of the entire virtual environment.