• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    in one regard I can understand, they’re running a business and don’t want to be at a disadvantage against their competition.

    on the other hand have some conviction for your product, otherwise I will lose confidence that your product is as good as your marketing makes it seem.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 minutes ago

      They are still bullish on LLM, just to augment rather than displace human suggested development.

      This perspective is quite consistent with the need for a product that manages prompting/context for a human user and helps the human review and integrate the LLM supplied content in a reasonable way.

      If LLM were as useful as some of the fanatics say, you’d just use a generic prompt and it would poop out the finished project. This is by the way the perspective of an executive I talked to not long ago, that he was going to be able to let go of all his “coders” and feed his “insight” directly into a prompt that will do it all for him instead. He is also easily influenced so articles like this can reshape him into a more tenable position, after which he’ll pretend he never thought a generic prompt would be good enough