• stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Every last bit of it? What is your stance on use of AI for tasks such as data analysis of massive sets for scientific research, or procedural automation of massive operations?

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        AI doesn’t exist, machine learning algorithms can be useful and are used with no controversy, generative bullshit is basically useless.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          You’re using a lot of very loosely defined terms with a lot of certainty. Machine learning is AI, we just usually apply it to the more simple versions of it. Where do you personally draw the line? I fully understand the plethora of risks, downsides, and injustices that can potentially be involved in the matter, but I legitimately don’t understand the extremist level hatred that some people express to anything that could hold the title of AI. To me, it parallels with someone saying that they hate ionizing radiation. Frequently, it’s also bad, and your entirely reasonable to try and avoid it on a daily basis, but it also has many uses that are beneficial and life-saving.

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup, these things are still garbage for >90% of all applications people are jamming them into. Breathed a sigh of relief when my company CEO said he doesn’t see us using AI for more than can center routing for at least the next several years.