More and more, i see people wearing these ‘smart’ glasses as sunglasses which i find totally creepy and intrusive. Living in the EU, i am wondering how these glasses are even ‘allowed’ in public or may even be sold here. It becomes harder to avoid cause they become so hard to identify. How to deal with this? To what extend is this allowed? (cause apparently it is some way)

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I mean, your freedom to record in public ends where my freedom to not be recorded in public starts.

    Prior to our wonderful times, and even more so in the UK, public space meant that were no right to privacy to be expected at all while using said public space because, you know, it was public. But the moronic age we live in have managed to change that. So be it.

    So, worry not my dear friend: as a law abiding citizen myself, I dutifully respect your so-called freedom to use what is supposed to a public space as your very own private space, and I 100% gave up on photography the second time I was confronted to the consequences of people considering their freedom implied they were to decide what ‘public’ meant.

    Instead, I switched to sketching the very same people in the very same public space.

    They may be as annoyed by me doing that but good luck forbidding me to sketch in a public space or even proving it was them I specifically I sketched… as, even though I do enjoy it, I suck at sketching ;)

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You can use public spaces all you like, you do not get to use my face however you like.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I said not allowed to take picture never told it was to publish or share them. Really, if you have access to you should read recent justice decisions and see how, here in France and in Germany at the very least, they will almost be in favor of… not the photographer, whether the photo was meant to be published or not, whether the photo earned them a cent or not.

        For the rest, we live in a free society and I will happily let anyone practice photography as they see fit (provided they do it politely) but don’t expect me to pretend trends have not changed in regards to justice and the right to image, because those trends they have indeed changed and not in favor of photographers.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t really care whether you benefit in any way from my picture, published or not, for profit or not. If I don’t want you to have it, you don’t get it. What gives you the right to take my picture? Besides, why do you even want it if you’re not using it for something?

          • Libb@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            What gives you the right to take my picture?

            Check the definition of the word public in ‘public space’.

            But I think you should first need to work on yourself, that would help a lot being able to have a discussion instead of what looks a little bit too much like an argument we certainly should not have you and I as I don’t know you and have as much desire to photograph you as I wish to eat poop.

            Have a nice day.