• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Is that true? I’m too scared to look up prices. Electronically, touchscreens are infinitely more complex, but I can believe economies of scale brought it down lower than buttons… I just don’t want to believe that.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve seen comments from auto manufacturers outright stating this. I think they also overestimated how much consumers care about touchscreens.

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Pretty much no button these days directly controls something, it’s routed through the BMS. Headlights may be one of the few that are switched without some type of computer in between, possibly power windows too?

          And they’re all on a PCB.

          • Ageroth@reddthat.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Even so, each individual button needs to be connected to that PCB separately, and will only have the function of what it says on the button, or possibly a couple hidden functions through programming.
            Touch screens are essentially one connection for infinite buttons with different screens and menus.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Touchscreens can be made at massive scale and then repurposed in batches for everywhere. They’re always the same (roughly speaking). Buttons are individual components, you have to lay the whole thing out custom how you want it to be, you have to put all these fiddly little components together… just having a robot make a big square object along with 199,999 other ones is cheaper, even if technically the big square object is orders of magnitude more complex than the chunks of plastic and springs and buttons etc.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yup, that about matches my thought process when I made that comment. Economies of scale make the complexity irrelevant.