A prominent general in Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard died in an Israeli airstrike that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut.

A prominent general in Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard died in an Israeli airstrike that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut, Iranian media reported Saturday.

The killing of Gen. Abbas Nilforushan marks the latest casualty suffered by Iran as the nearly yearlong Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Stripteeters on the edge of becoming a regional conflict. His death further ratchets up pressure on Iran to respond, even as Tehran has signaled in recent months that it wants to negotiate with the West over sanctions crushing its economy.

…

Nilforushan served as the deputy commander for operations in the Guard, a role overseeing its ground forces. What he was doing in Lebanon on Friday wasn’t immediately clear. The Guard’s expeditionary Quds Force for decades has armed, trained and relied on Hezbollah as part of its strategy to rely on regional militias as a counterbalance to Israel and the United States.

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    61·
    2 months ago

    Iranian officials are frequently assassinated while they’re with meeting with elements of their proxy forces, additionally, this didn’t happen on a front line or in an active war zone.

    You’re claiming that somehow Iran his risking escalation because Israel is assassinating their military leaders in civilian areas, that aren’t active war zones. Which is like saying your risking escalation if you attempt to defend yourself after someone breaks into your home, and murders your family.

    Technically, I guess that’s true, but it removes the onus from the person actually doing the home invasion and murdering.

    Also, your analogy is wrong. Russia killing US officers would not give Russia more cause to escalate, but the reverse…

    Regardless, none of that has to do with your original comment about Iran losing deniability in this proxy war.

    This is Israel trying to force an escalation, because they want to draw out a wider regional war that forces US naval assets (including marines) to intervene in.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      35·
      2 months ago

      Hezbollah is at war with Israel, their general getting killed near Iranian officers is problematic. Just as it would be if a Ukrainian general was killed by Russia while meeting with a US Colonel.

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        52·
        2 months ago

        Your analogies keep leaving out location, which is very relevant here.

        A more accurate analogy would be Russia bombing a meeting between Ukrainian and American officers, that was happening in Warsaw.

        I don’t disagree that this is a significant event, I just disagree with your analysis and attribution.

        • pewter@lemmy.worldEnglish
          34·
          2 months ago

          Your analogy requires a powerful faction of people in Poland directly shooting rockets at Russian-occupied Ukraine. Still a significant event, but this descent continually shows the problem with analogies.

          • pandapoo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            5·
            2 months ago

            It’s not my analogy, and I’ve already pointed out how bad it was, but they keep insisting on using it.

            But yes, I agree, it’s a shit analogy.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          15·
          2 months ago

          Warsaw would make less sense. This was a strike in Lebanon against a Lebanon based terrorist group or political party if you prefer. That parties primary action has been from within Lebanon. There was no third country here.