• rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Bookmark at not intuitive enough to me and RSS feeds are still feeds that have no interaction features like the writer of this article like.

    I am always for giving the most power to users. I like compromises like user settings so people who want a feed with interactions can and who doesn’t can disable it

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      But why do we need interactive crap for everything. Comments and etc for articles are the worst. Not everybody needs to hear you, sometimes you’ve just gotta take in information and process it.

      Like I literally Maintain my own fleet of apps that give me just the article body images, in a sorted feed. No ads. No links. Nothing. Even the links to other articles, etc in the middle of an article is too much. I hate that shit. Modern web page design is garbage and unreadable.

      I don’t need to know stacy from North Dakota’s thoughts on an article because 99% of the time it’s toxic anyways. Or misinformed.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Interactiviry seems to be a good thing. What brings you to participate here on Lemmy?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Modern web page design is garbage and unreadable.

        Because it’s a “newspaper meets slot machine” design. Kills two birds with one stone, hijacking media (censorship is invisible) and making money (invisible too).

        I don’t need to know stacy from North Dakota’s thoughts on an article because 99% of the time it’s toxic anyways. Or misinformed.

        And also because not every place is supposed to be crawling with people.