• Ardens@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Feel free to list them - with evidence and not just prejudice…?

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago
        1. No end-to-end encryption by default, you have to explicitly start a secret chat. That means that instead of it all being encrypted noise, secret chats stand out.
        2. Servers are not open source (last time I checked). Why not? Seriously, why not?
        3. Admittedly, not much of an issue any more, but in the beginning they had horrible security (so did WhatsApp until Facebook threw some competent engineers at the problem)
        • Ardens@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          There’s end-to-end encryption. It’s fine that you can chose what needs to be private, and what doesn’t need to be.

          There could be several reasons as to why the servers are not OS. Why do you need that part to be OS? Seriously, why?

          Oh, so your problem with Telegram is, that it had some issues in the past, just like EVERY other app in the beginning? Nice one. :-)

          So, let’s summarize.

          1. You lie, and say that there’s no end-to-end encryption when there is.
          2. It would be preferable to have OS servers, but it’s not a major issue, since everything else is.
          3. You have an issue with something in “Back to the Future”… Which is no longer an issue.