• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      it also would have very publically been a huge failure. Tesla tended to ignore the science when he didn’t like it. It could not have possibly worked

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago
      • + Wireless

      • - limited range

      • - horribly inefficient, increasing with distance

      So, there.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        tesla’s idea was global wireless power. no idea what his efficiency numbers were though.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you somehow under the impression that just because it is “global” there are no transmitters and receivers and distance does not matter?

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            no. i don’t pretend to even begin to understand how the prototype at wardenclyffe was supposed to work. i do remember that it supposedly used the atmosphere as a transmission line, but whether that meant bouncing the signal off of it (meaning it was radio based) or somehow charging it (meaning it was static based) i couldn’t tell you.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean you absolutely can communicate from Australia to USA with nothing but an old rusty bed frame and 5 watts of power. So there’s that. But not much more to do with that bit of non-ionising power.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      We, today, understand how to power something wirelessly. The problem is it’s horribly inefficient.