• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If you ignore take off and landing, birds, weather conditions, and everything else that makes flying more complex and dangerous than driving on the ground, sure.

    • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And if you ignore construction sites with high cranes and not documented buildings. Or overland high voltag power cables, wind mills, hobby drones, and local variations of birds.

      It‘s just taking the complex challenges of autonomous drivinf into the third dimension. Making it even more complex.

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Other than the takeoff and landing, cars have to deal with those obstacles as well.

      A computer running a citywide automated traffic system for cars would have all the same complexity, without the ability to separate traffic in three dimensions.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        So yeah, if you ignore the parts that make it more complicated it seems easier!

        If it is windy, it is far more complicated than driving on the road, especially in cities with taller buildings. Like not crashing into buildings is far harder than applying the brakes when there is ever changing wind shear that you can’t see. This applies to most days in most cities.