‘Open source’, a phrase deliberately engineered with several different meanings, is very effective at scamming us out of libre software.
A service cannot have a software license. It is a service, not software. We are not bound by a software license when someone else runs their software on their device.
‘Open source’, a phrase deliberately engineered with several different meanings, is very effective at scamming us out of libre software.
A service cannot have a software license. It is a service, not software. We are not bound by a software license when someone else runs their software on their device.
There is a nice writeup on this by the GNU people:
If you leave the cornered brackets empty, some clients (like mine) won’t show the link at all:
Your link doesn’t display. My client treats it as an image URL.
Here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.en.html
Did you really use the “insert link” option to put a link in your comment?
Just paste the link directly into the text body.
deleted by creator
Yes, correct, and the title does not say AGPL or libre software. ‘Open source service’ is a nonsense.