Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.
Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion
Edit2: IP= intellectal property
Edit3: sort by controversal
You’re just factually wrong. Now you may have an argument that someone that’s driving drunk may be a better driver than someone that’s a bad driver while sober, but alcohol impairment reduces inhibitions, increases reaction time, impairs motor control, and alters judgement. That objectively makes you a more dangerous driver compared to your sober self.
would you rather be the designated driver leaving a bar at 2am knowing you’re in a society that frowns upon drunk driving, but maybe people are well practiced at it, or knowing your in a society that punishes it drastically, so only the most desperate people attempt it?
Definitely the second. Because those people would still be driving drunk in the first case.
Having 2 horriblly-drunk drivers on the road is still better than having 2 horribly-drunk drivers plus another 20 moderately-drunky drivers.
I guess we all have different risk assessment