• ormr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So you think you can draw a connection between someone’s views on inclusive language and whether an individual or org can be trusted with software security.

    I’m sorry but to me this line of thinking is bonkers. The two things have nothing to do with each other whatsoever. What if a conservative individual argued that they have trust issues with an open source project because it features inclusive language now? The person might argue that they don’t understand why devs would devote their limited time to such cosmetics instead of focusing on code quality. How would you view this argument? On Lemmy it would probably be ridiculed, and rightfully so. Yet it’s the same line of thinking that I see if I interpreted your comment correctly.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thats because you don’t view it as a moral failing. How would racist language rank. What about nazi stuff. I mean none of that technically effects trustworthiness for running an org. Well ah. unless your the particular thing.

      • ormr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes but not using inclusive language is far from counting as a moral failing in my world… It’s far from racism, let alone nazi stuff. So what’s that comparison good for?