Yeah, and we need to make it last next time.

Lack of hope is a benefit, but not for you. People thought that a revolution was impossible even before the 20th century, and still, 1917 happened.

Thunder, for sure

Humans on Mars. We are 15 years late already.

Civilization III and/or V

Edit: If you have lot’s of time available.

Assuming your honesty and good faith on asking this question, the real treasure on our gene pool is it’s diversity. Eugenics would, by definition, reduce it. You could assume that it’s a low price to pay for health, longevity, strength, intelligence, beauty and so on, but it’s not that simple. Even some diseases (out or the possibility to develop it) can be beneficial under the right circonstances, e.g. sickle cell anemia can improve resistance to malaria.

It would be great to be able to prevent most diseases before it happens and treat it if it happens (for free, in a universal health care system), but eliminate the genes would be a very bad idea, a healthy specie needs it’s diversity to avoid extinction, and we sometimes feel like we are above that risk, but we are not that special.

Much more secure 👍🏾

Zen Browser since last week. Is a Firefox fork.

Technically true

I think you can block entire instances as a user. But, if not, you can create your own instance and federate with only the instances that you like. Far more work though.

Here: using Thunder.

Is not about how much we have available, is about how much they think they can squeeze us.

I think you are lost in the language. There are no absolute rights, in any legal systems. So any “law” necessarily restricts someone’s “rights”.

Therefore, you need to think about what “authoritarian decision” means, because if all law restricts someone’s rights, all laws are authoritarian by your definition.

Also: terrible example to begin with.

A rough translation of a brazilian quote for you: “In a fight between these guys, I cheer for the fight”.