Sufficiently and feasibly

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Exactly, this won’t be worth looking into before we have interstellar travel, and that is probably a very very long time away

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Actually, it might be worth doing this first. Once you’ve got even a partial Dyson swarm you’ve got ample energy to make interstellar travel a lot easier. You could either use beamed propulsion (lightsails or magsails), or manufacture bulk antimatter to fuel high-efficiency rocketry, or a combination of the two.

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        But you can’t do this to earth’s sun without causing catastrophic changes on earth, so you have to reach a different star before doing this. Blocking out even like 1% of the sun’s energy from reaching earth would likely wreak havoc on the earth

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Put the Dyson swarm at the orbit of the asteroid belt. Won’t block much in the way of light, but comets could become an issue.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Well, given that the earth only utilizes about 1 billionth of the sun’s energy, so I think we could have both with just a little effort.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, there’s ways to do this without damaging Earth. You could arrange the sphere so that there’s a gap that allows light through specifically to keep Earth lit, or you could use mirrors or straight up artificial light sources to maintain Earth’s sunlight levels.

          Or you get over the obsession with maintaining Earth exactly as it always was and carry on without it. Once we’re talking about Dyson spheres a planet like Earth would be a very minor population center. Probably more valuable as a source of additional building material than as a place to live in its own right.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol even in theory it’s dubious, in reality it’s absurd. Well never make it to that point.

      • spittingimage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Every argument I’ve seen against the cool science fiction future boils down to “we couldn’t do it this financial quarter, so it’ll never be possible at all”.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s not that. It’s that organized civilization won’t last long enough to get that advanced. How long do you think it’ll take to get that far scientifically? 3-4 centuries? We’re lucky if we get 2-3 decades left out of civilization between running out of resources, climate change, pfas, microplastics, fascism/war, and unbridled capitalism. That’s just shit that’s happening right now, not even including unexpected shit like super volcano eruptions or major meteor strike or something. We simply don’t have enough time to get that advanced.